|
.2
|
Choice of text style was appropriate for
presentation. Blended
use of text and white space.
Easy to read, neatly produced
|
The information is clearly written, well edited
with no grammatical errors. The language is appropriate for
the intended audience.
|
Illustrations provide a focus for demonstration
with out distracting from goal.
Well executed with design, style and placement support
|
Instructions are linear and progressive with each
step developed from the previous.
|
The audience is described and defined. Appropriate
skill level is addressed.
Adequate preparation for task is given and all relevant
safety issues are addressed.
|
|
.1
|
Text is neatly produced but style and/or colors may
dominate. Size
may be a factor.
|
Too much jargon.
Poor choice of verbs and/or descriptive words.
|
Illustrations or examples are present but may
overwhelm presentation. May
lack detail necessary to describe task.
May be too many examples and distract audience.
|
Steps are outlined but may lack sufficient detail
to fully describe the task.
|
Audience definition may be too vague.
Appropriate safety or product guidelines may be missing
or incomplete.
|
|
0
|
Poorly drawn or produced.
Shows lack of care.
Text style is difficult to read. Color or size may
interfere with legibility.
|
Repetitive, simple text with no transitions.
Limited descriptions.
|
Graphics do not demonstrate product or skill set.
May be limited in scope with critical details missing.
|
Information presented without a pattern.
Steps do not support the next in series.
|
Task and audience is too general.
Basic safety issues are omitted.
There is no attempt to address needs of user.
|
